I feel that the Vietnam War effected many
people that are in the age of my parents, making it difficult to show violent
images to students. One thing I wonder about is if the Vietnam War would have
more coverage in the history textbooks a hundred years from now, or if it would
be censored as it is today. I was told by my history teacher that the National
Archives of JFK are kept hidden until 2017 because many Americans would get
angry if they knew the secret about the incident. I don’t know if this is a
credible reason for the secrecy of the files, but if this was true, is the
government doing the same thing for the Vietnam War? Or are they not covering
the war fully to justify the war?
From the information Loewen gives us in his
book, it seems to be clear that the government is hiding a lot of information
to prevent students from having a bad image about their own country. There are
obviously a lot of shocking images and episodes that would be disturbing to
students that would not be appropriate for textbooks, because arguably they
could be harmful to students. I assume that there would be many parents
concerned about the material. Is it worth the risk to educate students about the
cruel acts of America? I don’t think any textbooks would risk it. It is too
much of an inconvenient truth.
(image source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Vietnam_War_protesters._1967._Wichita,_Kans_-_NARA_-_283625.jpg)
(image source: http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/images/kabc/cms_exf_2007/news/world_news/8685670_600x338.jpg)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿